Tahir Mirza - Supporting The Homeless

December 9, 2018

1/10
Please reload

We All Prosper Under A Government For The People.

June 4, 2017

1/5
Please reload

A Good Education Is A Right, Not A Commodity

June 1, 2017

1/2
Please reload

Tony Blair Prosecution Over Iraq War Blocked

July 31, 2017

 

The high court has ruled Tony Blair should not face prosecution for his role in the Iraq war. The lord chief justice, Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd, along with senior judge, Mr Justice Ouseley, said there was no 'crime of aggression' in English law where the former prime minister could be charged. Iraqi general, Abdulwaheed al-Rabbat attempted to bring a private war crimes prosecution against the former Prime Minister with his team of experienced lawyers. The Chilcot inquiry’s conclusion that the invasion of Iraq was unnecessary and undermined the United Nations, required the prosecution of Tony Blair with the aim to force Blair along with former foreign secretary Jack Straw and the former attorney general Lord Goldsmith to appear in court, answerable to charges. Michael Mansfield QC argued that the international crime of a war of aggression had been accepted by the then UK attorney general Sir Hartley Shawcross QC in the 1940s, at the time of the Nuremberg trials of Nazi war crimes. The attorney general, Jeremy Wright QC, intervened in the case on behalf of the government and contended the claim as, quote; ''hopeless!''

 

Thomas and Ouseley conceded; ''We see the force of Mr Mansfield’s contention that if there is a crime of aggression under international law, there should be a means of prosecuting it as otherwise the rule of law is undermined.''  Prosecution before an international court nonetheless presented “significant practical difficulties” they claimed. The clear principle is that it is for parliament and parliament alone to decide whether there should be a crime of aggression in domestic law. Responding to the judgment, Imran Khan, who represented general Al-Rabbat told the court both he and his client were disappointed with the judgment of the high court which effectively brings to an end any hope's of prosecuting Tony Blair, Jack Straw and Peter Goldsmith for the crime of aggression on the invasion of Iraq. 

 

 

Despite the clear findings of the Chilcot inquiry which laid bare the conduct of those that should be held to account, the high court has confirmed that there is to be no accountability. Those responsible are to remain unpunished. Mr Khan said the government had been given ''de facto domestic immunity'' because ''as long as it fails to enact legislation which makes the crime of aggression a domestic criminal offence, any leader can act as he/she chooses knowing that whatever action they take, it can be taken with complete impunity.''  Other countries, including Germany, Kosovo, and Serbia, have enacted domestic legislation, said Khan. ''The failure of the British government to give tangible commitment to the prosecution of the crime of aggression undermines the rule of law. It sets a dangerous precedent in times of global insecurity and sets an example to the rest of the world of how to commit the most serious of crimes and get away with it.''  

 

Perhaps now we could, and rightfully should see Parliament introduce legislation to ensure any crimes of agression will extend to face prosecution in a British court of law. Those convicted should face sentences worthy of and benefitting the crime. Of course this ruling today from the high court could also suggest Tony Blair is immune from prosectution. Quite how a British court would proceed with any prosectution in the future remain's to be seen as it could be argued that any Prime Minister facing charges could 'discover' a legal loophole and exploit the British justice system once again. However, at least if Parliament is seen to be complying it will also be seen as fit for purpose, something current British law's are lacking! 

 

Kenneth Walker for Political Provocateur

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Please reload

Political Provocateur works on all formats including Mobile and Tablet.  For the enhanced version of the site, please use Windows10/MacOSX on your Desktop or Laptop/Notebook. Remember to save this site to your browser by clicking the star in your address bar at the top of the page

© Political Provocateur 2019 - All Rights Reserved

Political Provocateur is interested in publishing tightly reasoned, factually based articles. Please keep submissions to no more than 1500 words  and send them to the editor of Political Provocateur Max Webster - MaxWebster1968@mail.com.  pasted in the body of an email.

Please avoid bad grammar, spell proper names correctly and give complete titles on first reference. Political Provocateur follows the Associated Press Stylebook. Please do not submit articles formatted as an open letter. As a rule, we only publish articles that are offered to us exclusively.

Be prepared to provide credible and complete documentation of the factual or logical basis of every statement contained in a submission.

If any third party is paying the author conditional on the piece getting published, that relationship must be disclosed.

Bear in mind while writing that attacks on individuals' character, ethnicity, birthplace, parentage, sexual orientation or personality are no substitute for logical argumentation, careful presentation of fact and intellectual civility. All articles published by Political Provocateur are the expressed opinion of the writer.

This site was designed with the
.com
website builder. Create your website today.
Start Now